Filed under: International Response, Lessons and Theory, Opinion/Editorial, Photos, Uncategorized | Tags: David Rieff, iraq, law of unintended consequences, new york times magazine, responsibility to protect
This week’s New York Time’s Magazine carries an article by writer and political analyst, David Rieff, entitled ” Humanitarian Vanities.” The question he poses is a simple one – What does the urge to intervene amount to?
One of his main points seems to be that there is a “law of unintended consequences” operating when a country or set of countries decide to intervene in another on humanitarian grounds. Regime change is never just that – it comes with baggage and unforseen challenges that the intervening country/countries have historically seemed ill equipped to handle. Case in point – Iraq.
Read the full article here.
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment