Burma Cyclone


Latest News: Political opposition launches new site by karenzr

On August 8, 1988, students in Rangoon led a wave of mass popular protest against the Burmese junta. The military government responded with a brutal crackdown– it was, roughly, the Burmese Tianamen Square.

The 20-year anniversary of the uprising is approaching, and August 8, 2008 also marks the start of the Olympics, hosted by the Chinese, who consistently defend the Burmese government in the international arena. The exile group 8-8-08 for Burma just launched a new site criticizing China and calling on readers to take action to draw attention to human rights abuses in Burma.

–Karen

Advertisements

3 Comments so far
Leave a comment

For Burmese Nationals in the U.S., the First Cyclone Came from the U.S. Departments of State and Justice

Students of Burmese history will tell you that the current regime, neither derived power from, nor the admiration and respect of the population most severely affected by and at greatest risk of perishing from what is essentially a natural disaster. It should be noted that the regime has been at war with and targeted, both for persecution and worse, a significant percentage of its population since coming to power, particularly those whom the international community now seeks to assist. The regime regards this natural disaster as a nothing short of supernatural blessing. What it could not do and hide as an act of commission – Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the Genocide Convention against those within its borders whom it detests, it has come to embrace the long awaited hand of nature to do for them, with its acquiescence.

To appreciate the underlying motivation behind the regime’s acts of omission, focus upon their response, both to the effects of the cyclone, international community now at its door step, and the net effect resultant from what they are not doing. While their technique may appear novel, their objectives remain anything but.

In light of the fact that the High Contracting Parties to the Genocide Convention have yet to find merit to intervene to prevent Genocide, as mandated pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention when premeditated acts of commission (delayed action in Bosnia and Kosovo, none whatsoever in Rwanda, and little more then rhetorical gymnastics regarding the issue of national sovereignty in Darfur, to name but a few), any serious student of history will tell you that there is no hope for those ethnic minorities whom the Burmese regime has long regarded as inconvenient, persecuted, and written off as disposable. Now sit back, listen to the silence and observe the inaction, and feckless response of our respective governments.

Headline: White House Throws a `Hail Mary Pass,’ Calling in the One Remaining Vestige of Morality it has Left – First Lady Laura Foregoes Another Reading of `My Pet Goat’ to George W., Jeopardizing Timely Completion of First Daughter’s Wedding Plans, Steps to the White House podium to Decry the Burmese Government’s Inaction on Behalf of its Cyclone (political and otherwise) Victims.

While the U.S. Department of State expresses difficulty securing landing rights from the Burmese Government for the delivery and dissemination of life saving humanitarian aid and visas for aid workers to distribute it, the U.S. Department of Justice’s refoulement agreement (forcible repatriation of refugees to the country from which they fled persecution into the hands of their persecutors) with the regime remains intact, uninterrupted, on schedule, and is given priority over humanitarian assistance.

According to the Burma (April 2007) Profile of Asylum Claims and Country Conditions Report (designed with intent to undermine the plausibility of all meritorious asylum claims involving Burmese nationals), authored (authors names and credentials withheld) and disseminated by the Department of State’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor to any U.S. asylum officer and immigration judge gullible enough to buy it, the Burmese regime, while somewhat eccentric, respects and defends the human rights of its people. Omission of references to `persecution’ coupled with State’s peddling the regime as one on fast track for and the inevitable attainment of Jeffersonian Democracy (note the post-cyclone impromptu national elections, distribution and sale of western emergency aid items to the regime’s ethnic kinsman, and political supporters), proves the Department of State no less effective in achieving through rhetorical gymnastics and historical revisionism regarding the status of human rights in Burma, what the cyclone achieved to the immutable strategic benefit and advancement of the regime through `natural means.’

Where the need presents, but the regime is unwilling to accept material assistance to save lives, the Department of State stands prepared to intervene to spare the regime’s reputation and defend its signatory status to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

In its conditional ratification of the Convention, the regime maintained that, `with reference to Article VI (of the Genocide Convention), the Union of Burma makes the reservation that nothing contained in the said Article shall be construed as depriving the Courts and Tribunals of the Union of jurisdiction or as giving foreign Courts and tribunals jurisdiction over any cases of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article III committed within the Union territory.’ Translation: no prosecution of a Burmese Government official for genocide unless they themselves opt to prosecute them.

p.s. Anyone ready to the take to the streets over the price of milk and whole wheat bread?

Michael Pellerin
Political Asylum Research
and Documentation Service (PARDS)
Princeton, New Jersey 08542 U.S.A.

Comment by Michael Pellerin

If anyone believes that the 1988 crisis was lead by students, then this person should stop involving and discussing in all kinds of political activities.
One should be abe to look into the diving forces behind the students. YES. Thousands of students took to the streets in 1988.One because an engieering student was killed by the riot police.(He was not the only student killed in political demonstrations worlwide.) Second, the BBC said college girls were raped by the police, a story later admitted by the girls who participated in Chris Gurness’s mock interview to be a fake.
Then what was the driving force then?.
The strongest of all was the diehard politicians who wanted to see Gen. Nay Win and all of the Socialist Party behind bars, in a revenge for their past failures. Second, the underground die hard communists,who grabbed that opportunity to bring down the socialist regime which they have tried and failed for the last 43 years.
If one closely watched the patterns of the “Student led Democracy movement” you can see the typical communist “Street tactics”.Reign of terror ( beheading of innocent victims, attack on police stations,road blocks,thugs becoming leaders of communities, etc.
Of the so called “Student Leaders” only a few were actual students at that time. Most have graduated already. Anyone can check this fact by their age. A student should be between the age of 18-24 in 1988. Its 20 years now. So if some one claims to be student activist at that time, the age should be 38-44.Because, what happened then was many young people who did not even pass matric exam and were out of work suddenly became students, when they wore “Student Green” Sarongs.Same with fresh graduates, who still claimed to be students evern after they left universities and colleges years ago.
So my opinion is that if anyone beleives the 1988 crisis in Burma was a student led one,then it will be like saying that the 1917 October revolution was made by Russian Workers (without the leadersship of the communists)or the Berlin Wall was brought down by ordinary citizens of Berlin (without the help of Western Powers and Vatican).
Tommy
Yangon..

Comment by tommy

hahahahahaha this is soooo sad and some people need to stop being so greety

Comment by words




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: