Filed under: International Response, Latest News, Lessons and Theory, Media, Opinion/Editorial, Uncategorized | Tags: bosnia, china, darfur, france, humanitarian intervention, kosovo, resolution, rwanda, security council, sierra leone, somalia, sudan, u.s., u.s. campaign for burma, UK
I have opposed many of the macho military interventions conducted by the west over the past decade. Their justifications have been obscure, their motives mixed and their morality situational, especially those aimed at “regime change”. Those in Afghanistan and Iraq had the additional defect of built-in failure.
On the other hand the west did intervene to try to stop humanitarian catastrophes in Bosnia from 1992, Somalia in 1993, Kosovo in 1998 and Sierra Leone in 2000. The failure to intervene in Rwanda in 1994 and more recently in Sudan’s Darfur province was generally attributed not to timidity but to the logistical difficulty of deploying power in the African interior.>>
I disagree with that last sentence, but an interesting discussion nonetheless.
U.S. Campaign for Burma also compared Burma and Rwanda, calling on the U.S., U.K and France to send in aid without the junta’s permission and despite China’s block on a Security Council resolution to authorize such a move.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment